SLS©
vs. SLA Comparison
Material Properties: The SLA
(stereolithography) process is limited to photosensitive resins
which are typically brittle. The SLS process can utilize polymer
powders that, when sintered, approximate thermoplastics quite
well.
Surface Finish: The surface
of an SLS part is smooth yet has a powdery feel. The smoother
surface of an SLA part typically wins over SLS when an appearance
model is desired. In addition, if the temperature of uncured
SLS powder gets too high, excess fused material can collect
on the part surface. This can be difficult to control since
there are so many variables in the SLS process. In general,
SLA is a better process where fine, accurate detail is required.
However, a varnish-like coating can be applied to SLS parts
to seal and strengthen them.
Dimensional Accuracy: SLA is
more accurate immediately after completion of the model, but
SLS is less prone to residual stresses that are caused by
long-term curing and environmental stresses. Both SLS and
SLA suffer from inaccuracy in the z-direction (neither has
a milling step), but SLS is less predictable because of the
variety of materials and process parameters. The temperature
dependence of the SLS process can sometimes result in excess
material fusing to the surface of the model, and the thicker
layers and variation of the process can result in more z inaccuracy.
SLA parts suffer from the "trapped volume" problem in which
cups in the structure that hold fluid cause inaccuracies.
SLS parts do not have this problem.
Support Structures: SLA parts
typically need support structures during the build. SLS parts,
because of the supporting powder, sometimes do not need any
support, but this depends upon part configuration. Marks left
after removal of support structures for parts cause dimensional
inaccuracies and cosmetic blemishes.
Machining Properties: In general,
SLA materials are brittle and difficult to machine. SLS thermoplastic-like
materials are easily machined.
Size: SLS and SLA parts can
be made the same size, but if sectioning of a part is required,
SLS parts are easier to bond.
Investment Casting: The investment
casting industry has been conservative about moving to RP
male models, so SLS models made from traditional waxes, etc.
are preferred. Sterolithography.com, however, utilizes a special
process which allows SLA models to be more suitable for investment
casting. Since SLA resins do not melt but burn to form ash,
this special method modifies the build process so that the
interior of the model is hollow with a supporting latticework.
When the ceramic is fired, the modified SLA model collapses
and any ash is minimal because of the small total quantity
of material. |